I just finished
reading The Futurological Congress,
and I can confidently say it was the most bizarre novel I have ever
experienced. Lem’s style takes the reader through an intense stream of
consciousness first-person narrative by the protagonist, Ijon Tichy. The
nonsensical arrangements of images and events make the distinctions between
reality and illusion impossible to identify. This struggle to identify reality,
however, is shared by both the reader and
the protagonist. Neither is ever completely sure where reality ends and
illusion begins. This sets up a reliability complex where neither the narrator
nor his counterparts can be trusted.
Lem offers a terrifying alternative to
a utopian future that is strikingly similar to the movie The Matrix. Both works reveal a world only lived through
simulation—where concrete reality barely exists, and we only perceive life
through our imaginations. While both works are extreme examples of what may
come of our world, we are beginning to see hints at this future through our
consumption of technology today.
Today, children might be tempted to
play Wii tennis instead of going outside. Lonely bachelors might log on to a
virtual life online to connect with other “people.” I recently saw a special
about technological therapy, where people in rehabilitation centers were
encouraged to walk slowly on a treadmill while a virtual reality of beautiful
forests was presented around them. Currently, these virtual realities can do a
lot of harm and good. Lem, however, might argue that virtual realities are only
dangerous and can lead to the disastrous circumstances he described in The Futurological Congress.
No comments:
Post a Comment