In Karel Caprek’s R.U.R., we visit the familiar topic of human
intelligence and the blurred lines between subservient and lesser beings and
their masters. Like in Frankenstein,
technology has allowed man to create another human-like creature. However, the dissonance
comes from Frankenstein viewing his creation as a monster, whereas the monster
viewed himself as a human, with real feelings, emotions, and human needs.
Similarly, in R.U.R., technology has
progressed to the point where these robots are not what we would consider
‘robots’. They are essentially human clones. However, like in Frankenstein, they are still treated as
if they are machine.
Though it was written almost 100
years ago, it still holds extremely relevant pertinence today. In an age of
exponentially advancing technology, we will eventually reach the point of being
able to create a replica of a human that thinks and feels with the same
processes as we do. The ethical dilemma will come when we have to decide how
human to make these robots, and for what purpose we want them for. If we are
looking for them to be a cheaper form of labor, we cannot make the same mistake
that occurred in R.U.R. and allow
them to thinking and feel for themselves. Just because we reach that point in
technology and are able to give them emotions doesn’t mean that we should do
it. At this point, technologies are improving at such fast paces that it seems
that we don’t stop to consider the ramifications and consequences of our
creations as a society.
You make a good point. The timelessness of the message of the books we have read so far seem to be common in all sci-fi books and it will be interesting to see if the books we will read next will have the same kind of messages.
ReplyDelete